<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking the Nokia Booklet. Part 2.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/</link>
	<description>If it&#039;s not open it&#039;s broken.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puleen</title>
		<link>http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Puleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openattitude.com/?p=418#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Good point, I didn&#039;t realize that the Booklet didn&#039;t have touch-interface. Stick to netbook linux distro&#039;s then. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, I didn&#8217;t realize that the Booklet didn&#8217;t have touch-interface. Stick to netbook linux distro&#8217;s then. <img src='http://openattitude.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puleen</title>
		<link>http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Puleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openattitude.com/?p=418#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Good point, I didn&#039;t realize that the Booklet didn&#039;t have touch-interface. Stick to netbook linux distro&#039;s then. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, I didn&#8217;t realize that the Booklet didn&#8217;t have touch-interface. Stick to netbook linux distro&#8217;s then. <img src='http://openattitude.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 28/1/2010: Netflix Petition; KDE SC 4.3.5 Released &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 28/1/2010: Netflix Petition; KDE SC 4.3.5 Released &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openattitude.com/?p=418#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] Breaking the Nokia Booklet. Part 2. Two things are clear from this experience: (1) Nokia made a very poor choice with the GMA 500, and (2) Wubi is a fantastic way to get Linux on your freedom-hating machine. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Breaking the Nokia Booklet. Part 2. Two things are clear from this experience: (1) Nokia made a very poor choice with the GMA 500, and (2) Wubi is a fantastic way to get Linux on your freedom-hating machine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openattitude.com/?p=418#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Looks interesting, but I&#039;m not sure I see the point of a touchscreen-based OS on a non-touchscreen device.

Given the issues I&#039;m having with this Booklet so far, my Eee PC might be a better choice for something like this. Have you tried it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting, but I&#8217;m not sure I see the point of a touchscreen-based OS on a non-touchscreen device.</p>
<p>Given the issues I&#8217;m having with this Booklet so far, my Eee PC might be a better choice for something like this. Have you tried it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://openattitude.com/2010/01/27/breaking-the-nokia-booklet-part-2/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openattitude.com/?p=418#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Looks interesting, but I&#039;m not sure I see the point of a touchscreen-based OS on a non-touchscreen device.

Given the issues I&#039;m having with this Booklet so far, my Eee PC might be a better choice for something like this. Have you tried it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting, but I&#8217;m not sure I see the point of a touchscreen-based OS on a non-touchscreen device.</p>
<p>Given the issues I&#8217;m having with this Booklet so far, my Eee PC might be a better choice for something like this. Have you tried it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

